Noam Chomsky, Professional Liar

NOTE: For those readers new to this blog, I am a Serb who has spent decades living under various Socialist/Communist dictatorships, so I speak from experience: something you can't buy at Wal-Mart or gain from propagandist left-wing YouTube videos.

"He is the greatest intellectual in the world. I agree totally with his views on globalism." - Vojislav Seselj; former Hague Tribunal inmate, war criminal, ultra-nationalist, gay-basher, fanatical Putin supporter, ex(?)-Marxist and psychopath.

This is a collection of Chomsky-related excerpts from my much larger rant called "Marxism: A Guide For Gullible Clueless Westerners". Presented here are some of Professor Bullshit's quotes that I have deconstructed i.e. cleansed of all bullshit. Each quote has a translation that is a result of this de-bullshitization process. 

Keep in mind that all these excerpts have been taken out of the context in which I wrote them, but that they will make sense on the whole, even presented like this, randomly listed. Certainly, they will make infinitely more sense than the pure, unfiltered, undistilled bullshit offered to you by Professor Bullshit himself. 

The big fat irony is that this chronic bullshitter is (allegedly) a logician; this fact boggles the mind. Apparently, logic is something to which only others need adhere to, not the "Master Logician" himself; he is allowed to bullshit freely; to ignore facts, twist them, to spin, re-spin, and then spin again, with only very few people daring to oppose him. I am one of those few. (It's a shitty job but someone's gotta do it.)

Translating Bullshittese into English requires a solid knowledge of history, a good grasp of political demagoguery, a semantic approach to the linguistically hidden real meanings i.e. the ability to read between the lines, and a well-developed bullshit-radar - which is why Noam's statements are so readily misunderstood by millions of his adoring dumb fans, because very few of them possess any of these qualities, all of which are essential in understanding his particular brand of "logic", language, and bullshit. 

That is why I am here to help them, and anybody else faced with this quasi-intellectual, bullshitting threat to democracy hence freedom.

I will be adding more quotes gradually, because Professor Bullshit never ever tires of bullshitting. He has perpetual diarrhea of the mouth, as all narcissistic American public figures, and I am here to clean him up a bit, wipe that shit off his face so you can see the real man behind the bullshit. 

De-Quoting The Quotes: Professor Bullshit

Translation of this pseudo-intellectual self-contradictory self-serving gobbledygook: 

"I am in favour of a democracy BUT...
BUT 
(get ready for a lengthy BUT, ye sheep) as long as government institutions are under popular control - and by that I of course mean that the control they're under is popular amongst me, other college Marxists, me, Castro, me, and Al-Qaeda. Additionally, I am for this democracy thingy but only if it entails no freedom for ambitious, intelligent, hard-working people to acquire personal assets and increase their wealth which is of course extremely evil, and as long as wicked corporations (which are so very evil by a ludicrous definition that only I and my obedient, dumb students understand) only function under strict supervision from massive, heavily-bureaucratized government institutions that are run by people appointed by Marxists (and even better: by myself personally). Capitalism does not allow anybody to do anything that's remotely free - aside from letting people get on happily with their lives - and of course the system I propose (which I can't mention here by name) isn't anti-democratic at all - because I say so. Industrialists are all crooks because they hog all the wealth for themselves and never let me have any, although I always pretend that the real reason I despise them is because they starve the poor that I frankly couldn't give three shits about, which is why I prefer a system in which a handful of dogmatic assholes like myself pull all the strings and get rich without having to work for it, while people who play by my rules get the shit end of the stick. Forget the fact that corporations when given breathing space generally increase employment and create more and cheaper goods - that is of no interest to me because I fucking hate the rabble i.e. those damn humanoids and their "needs". The only alternative to so-called "capitalist democracy" (which is such an oxymoron - simply because I the magnificent Marxist intellectual say that it is) is something that I dare not mention directly, which is why this quote sounds so mysterious. Suffice it to say that the alternative that I am unwilling to mention here by name starts with M and ends with ism."

So strong is Noam's urge not to have everyone find out he is a Communist, and so cunning a linguist is he that he totally avoids using the word but at the outset - in spite of the fact that the entire statement is one big anti-democracy BUT rant. A semantically-gifted bullshit-meister language-rapist par excellence, our honourable professor.

Noam Chomsky, the Jesus of modern western Marxism, has no college degrees in any of the natural sciences. What he does have, though, is the arrogance - and cojones - to criticize the greatest modern minds of astrophysics and cosmology by telling them that "the singularity is science-fiction". In his non-professional, uninformed, dilettante view, physicists had been wasting their time on utter nonsense the past few decades. 

Whether or not the singularity is fact or fiction is not the point here. The point is that Chumpsky is out of his depth discussing a highly complex mathematical/cosmological theory that he understands next to nothing about.

The megalomania and narcissism required for a linguistics expert to suddenly start fancying himself an expert on everything must truly be vast. Professor Bullshit, as I refer to him, would very gladly teach the whole world about all fields of both natural and human sciences, if he only had the time to do it - for he is as all-knowing and omniscient as a god. What a putz. 
He has publicly decried the "overly complex language" that physicists use, reminding me a bit of a truck-driver who stares emptily at 2001: A Space Odyssey, burps when the film ends, and then cries out "what the fuck is this shit all about?!". And then burps again. What a fine, fine intellectual Professor Bullshit turns out to be.

Mr. Chumpsky is a typical sociology-obsessed pompous egghead with an anti-scientific mind, and with a disrespect for scientists and science that is so prevalent amongst Marxists. He should have been born 300 years earlier when men like him became renowned philosophers - i.e. so-called thinkers who never had to prove any of their mostly wild scientific claims. That this kind of anti-intellectual conspiracy-theorist fraud managed to make a name for himself in the 21st century is a testament to the West's inability to deal with public liars and thought-polluters.

Translation of Professor Bullshit's hypocritical bullshit:  

"I question everything, except my own dogmatic arrogance and my pathological fanaticism. I want you also to question everything - except my own views, which are to be taken at face value and learned by heart without questioning. 
Question everything the Right does, but make sure you only question their views - as opposed to trying to analyze their arguments with an open mind using logic. Only QUESTION, and then stop there, not allowing any further thought processes to take place in your empty head. In fact, when I say question, what I really mean is ignore, i.e. ignore anything you hear from the Right - especially if it sounds as if it might make sense to you."

Translation of Professor Bullshit's spin-doctoring bullshit:  

"Of course, I am talking about the fucking idiots in the States, not the fucking rabble in Marxist dictatorships. I am fully aware that if the damn western riff-raff doesn't know much, that this could only be the fault of left-wing liars such as myself who control most of the media hence most of the information that the fucking rabble gets must be erroneous or at the very least heavily filtered - so no wonder the morons are clueless. Of course, if they voted for the American Communist Party, I'd praise their intellect, education and common sense." 


What Professor Bullshit knows all-too-well, but prefers to keep to himself, is that nowhere is the acquisition of (more-or-less) reliable information easier than in free (capitalist) democracies - even those whose press is heavily left-leaning i.e. almost as bullshit-happy as our respected professor of bullshit, Professor Noam Bullshit. Even flawed sources of information such as the British The Independent (anything but independent) & The Guardian (perhaps a guardian of Marxist ideology?), the French Liberation (meaning enslavement in this case), or the German Berliner Zeitung are more reliable and less biased examples of journalism than the utter propaganda fabrications that are being served to the luckless proletariat in tyrannies such as Cuba, Venezuela, or North Korea - all communist regimes which Chumpsky whole-heartedly supports in spite of literally millions of human-rights violations ascribed to them, filed in part by human-rights organizations which Chomsky recognizes.
 
Furthermore, this statement reveals much of Professor Bullshit's sense of superiority plus hidden disdain and low opinion of the "masses" he supposedly cherishes, treating them not like idiots but double-idiots, for not even being aware that they are not aware of what's going on in a successful 200 year-old democracy. 

This quote, one of many learned by rote by Noam's army of misfit fans, is a typical example of the upper-class snobbery (the irony...) which intellectual frauds such as Chumpsky exhibit, i.e. everybody is a bloody fool except his Royal Marxist Highness. To make this claim in a country with arguably the freest media in the world is nothing short of demagoguery of the most blatant sort. I could easily re-name this professional liar into Professor Demagogue, but I think his current new name suits him much better.

The U.S. voters aren't nearly Left enough for Chomsky's extremist desires - that's ALL this quote is about, nothing more. A bitter statement from a bitter man who made a bitter realization that America is still quite far from the Red Revolution nightmare this incurable sociopath dreams of.

Here's another moron from Occupy Wall Street. Please read the Goethe quote. Sounds familiar?

Translation/Interpretation of Professor Chumpsky's bullshit:

Noam picks and chooses whose suffering he will make public to the hordes of devoted morons who cling on to his every word as if they come from God himself. Listening to rabid Western Marxists such as this consummate liar and fact-manipulator, one would almost be lead to believe that 60s/70s Vietnam, 30s Spain, and WW2 Europe were the only times/places where death, destruction and supreme injustice reigned supreme. Professor Chumpsky couldn't care less about the dozens of millions of people who died under Communist regimes and as a result of Marxist-initiated wars and conflicts, yet is mysteriously concerned and teary-eyed about the dead in their favourite wars - the only "justifiable" wars, as far as Leftists are concerned. 
Furthermore, this almost criminal statement would have you believe that all those Vietnam corpses were a result of U.S. gunfire. To the uninformed and naive ears, Noam is implying, quite slyly without saying it bluntly, that the Vietnam war was all about American airplanes randomly bombing the entire country - rather than mention the fact that it was just another needless Civil War in which both sides committed murder on a large scale. But Noam couldn't care less about people murdered by Communists; such death-tolls are of no interest to this fine intellectual and humanist.

Translation of Professor Bullshit's bullshit:  

"The U.S. and its NATO allies are the real terrorists and murderers, whereas Islamic extremists/losers with bombs strapped to their bodies are only good-natured benevolent freedom-fighters who have no choice but to kill thousands of innocent civilians - most of whom are fortunately white westerners - as they fight against western capitalist corporate oppression which seeks to preserve Christianity, democracy and civilization all three of which of course suck - in the mind of Professor Horseshit."

The pot calling the kettle black - a reverse-accusation tactic as old as politics itself. Noam Chomsky willfully places himself on the side of all the Bin Ladens of this world with comments such as this. Professor Bullshit not only defends terrorists with this latent but blatantly misanthropic statement, but also encourages and promotes it, thereby removing the last speck of doubt anybody might still have had that he is indeed a raging, flaming, and angry psychopath. (Remember: psychopaths don't always look like overweight, round-headed barflies. They come in many shapes, sizes, and disguises. Sometimes they disguise themselves as soft-spoken, frail-looking, "well-meaning" intellectuals.)

Translation of Professor Bullshit's Bullshit:

Here Professor Chumpsky more-or-less pretends to criticize the American education system - which is basically in the hands of the Left, what with most major universities being a breeding ground for new generations of left-leaning morons, daily brainwashed by their liberal and Marxist professors. What Doctor Bullshit very conveniently omits to tell us is that it is precisely liberal propaganda and their main weapon of choice - Political Correctness - that are weeding out individualists i.e. young people who show a propensity for questioning established "truths", i.e. kids who dare to oppose their professors' red-stained political views. 

This quote is also an ideal example of how Marxists operate: they create a mess themselves and then pin blame on the Right for supposedly making that mess! The goal? Undermine the intellectually superior opposition yet again. It is an offense-is-the-best-defense type of a liar's tactic that is perhaps as old as civilization itself. The Left cannot beat the Right with logical argumentation, so they prefer to use lies and baseball bats.

Translation of Professor Bullshit's bullshit:  

"There is no need to look for heroes, since you all already have ME! I am to be your only hero and idol, the icon you pray to instead of Jesus. I, the Chumpsky, am your Lord, and you shall not have any idols besides me. Luckily for you, I also have ALL the great ideas as well, so I'm nothing if not the perfect package. 
But if you find me too ugly, annoying, or just plain boring, you can always make Karl your idol and God. He is a dead German so you don't have to listen to him give lengthy, dull, confusing lectures. His written bullshit almost rivals mine, so he is a worthy second choice, IF you make the wrong decision of not picking me as your new spiritual and political leader."

Am explanation of Professor Bullshit's bullshit: 

Three things I want you to focus your attention on in this anti-capitalist mini-rant.

One, the romantic idealization of tribal existence, which is at the core of Karl Marx's idiotic and naive vision of pre-society man. One would assume that Noam is suggesting we all go back to the caves - much as the extremist Greens fantasize about.

Two, notice how he avoids mentioning the mega-polluters China and Russia; two huge economies (hardly tribal societies!) whose anti-pollution laws are still in the Stone Age (forgive the ironical pun). China is communist, Russia is anti-American and practically communist, hence both are under protection by His American Royal Marxist Highness. They are free to pollute as much as they want to, as far as Noam is concerned.

Three, notice the bombastic language he uses, almost like a crazed, radical street-corner preacher: "full-speed ahead... to destroy... as quickly as possible". He stopped just short of claiming that western democracies are doing this intentionally, that their aim is to destroy the environment! It is an accusation that is both preposterous and utterly illogical.

Make no mistake: this is not a pro-environmental statement, it's an anti-capitalist rant. This selective blame-pinning once again goes to show that Noam is not an idealist, but an opportunist and a charlatan. He picks and chooses which innocent corpses he will "care" about (he doesn't give a shit about any), and he picks and chooses which tyrannies he will decry as evil (he generally decries democracies as evil). He uses inflammatory exaggerations, which is what all lunatics and hate-speakers do. 
He couldn't care less about the environment, but merely uses it as an additional tool to undermine the success of capitalism and to spread falsehoods about societies that practice it. In short, he is a flaming hypocrite and one of the biggest - hence most dangerous - public liars in the West.

An analysis of Professor Bullshit's utter bullshit:

Here is a great example of how Mr. Chumpsky "proves" a non-fact by making a bunch of totally unproven, even illogical assumptions.

1) large debt = not having a desire to change society

What the hell does one have to do with the other? A student accumulates debt - and suddenly his desire to change the world (if he had one to begin with) drops to zero. This is speculative nonsense, nothing more. Did Chumpsky actually base this assumption on a series of studies? One study? No, he merely made it up - because he needed a starting point to reach his lofty "conclusion", which he intended to anyway reach well in advance of even analyzing the background information relating to the topic at hand. 

Using the reverse of this chomskian "logic", we can safely conclude that:

low debt or zero debt = a huge need to change society

But does that make sense either? A person who has no debt is a happier person (on average) than the one with the large debt, so if debt did have anything to do with the motivation to change society (which I doubt) then wouldn't it make more sense for the person who is unhappy (i.e. debt-ridden) to want to see change happen? It is dissatisfaction that breeds political discontentment and a resulting revolution, not a lack of problems. Duh.

Obviously, Professor Bullshit hasn't thought this through at all but is merely talking out of his red-stained ass - or he knows that this is just one of his many bullshit statements, the type he can make off-hand because his followers think that he is an all-knowing god hence they never question a damn thing he says.

2) A person who is in debt is not "trapped" into debt by someone, as Chumpsky claims, but is alone responsible for his own debt. Chumpsky, the socialist weasel that he is, never lets the individual assume responsibility for anything - hence this typical blame-society-for-everything Marxist-ideology bullshit that he is implying here. 

3) having debt = no time to think i.e. an inability to think

Quite to the contrary, people who have large debts are forced to think quick and hard how to solve the financial crisis they find themselves in. It is the people who are not in debt that can relax, worry less, hence think less. 
So if there is any connection between these two concepts, it could only be the reverse of what this illogical putz is saying.

4) increases in fees = disciplinary technique

Might these increases be a result of rising costs or inflation?

5) a student finishing college = a student loaded with debt

Bullshit. Many students do not end up with much, or any, debt by the time they finish. This largely depends on their financial sources, such as how wealthy their parents are. 
IF their parents are not wel-off enough, then students need to work in order to finance their studies - and if they don't want to work, then tough luck! 
Poor but very gifted students have a good chance of receiving scholarships, so only poor and average or below-average students might have the kind of trouble Noam is talking about. But does society really need that many average or below-average college graduates? If you're average or worse, get a fucking job at McDonalds! Not everybody can - or should - have a college degree. 

6 ) "They have internalized the disciplinarian culture" is typical semantic sociology horseshit that means almost nothing. 

Noam doesn't want to express in plain English his cretinous conclusion that students experiencing growing debt are whipped into submission like a bunch of brain-washed idiots and are henceforth unable to rebel against the capitalist oppression. This is the nonsensical point he really means to make here.

7) In the end, Noam reaches the staggeringly far-fetched conclusion that all these non-facts listed previously must lead us to believe that debt turns young people into mindless zombie Wal-Mart-goers, unable to think for themselves, and obsessed with buying the next great useless product! Then he makes another leap in illogic by connecting that with the unwilligness of young people to stir up a Red Revolution. No, Chumpsky; the "proletariat uprising" you are really trying to address here (but don't dare mention by name) hasn't occurred not due to some clever government scheme to keep everyone in debt but because people are not starving like they are in the countries whose tyrannies YOU support(ed): North Korea, the former USSR etc.

In fact, people are by nature consumers! People have needs and wants, most of which relate to their mortal nature, and their inability to exist without shelter and food. The fact that the more advanced, civilized man wants to add a few luxuries to the basics that he might already have is what Noam considers "decadent", pointless, and counter-productive. I'd like to see Noam's villa, to see how HE lives; probably just as multi-million-dollar-villa-cozy as his pal Michael Moore.

Not to mention the blatant hypocrisy of working at high-profile, ultra-expensive universities from which Noam happily takes high salaries derived from the money provided by his "debt-ridden, exploited" students! 
Put your money where your mouth is, Noam. Or stop taking that money if it's robbing America of its freedom, you bloody liar.

A critique of Professor Bullshit's utter horseshit:

How exactly is "popular culture" giving people the impression that they are politically impotent? Not to mention the irony and hypocrisy of Chumley knowing full well that popular culture is inundated with political correctness and left-wing ideology, hence even if pop culture were the culprit, then his left-wing buddies would be to blame instead of corporations which are his favourite scapegoat and no.1 (imaginary) nemesis.

He talks about propaganda, as if only the Right practices it. Never mind the astounding might and exorbitant amounts of cash that pour in from all sides (Hollywood, for example) into financing the Left's own propaganda machine, which is, if anything, ten times as powerful and omnipresent as that of Chumley's opposition. 

Besides, where are the studies that prove that most people feel this way? Occupy Wall Street - which Chumley fully supports (and directs) - claims that they are "the 99%". Chumpsky doesn't say that the majority feels helpless but he is implying it. After all, why would he be making a point about how a minority feels helpless?

It also has to be said that Chumley slyly pretends as if the ordinary citizen - on his own - could ever influence anything in a major way. He knows that he can't. In no healthy system is this possible. The only way to have a major impact is to rise in the political hierarchy or become a top capitalist. That's just the reality of human existence, and Noam knows it damn well - but pretends as if a switch to communism could possibly change that. Bullshit-artist extraordinaire. 

Of course, the quote ends with the usual baloney, the criticism of "consumerism". If it isn't a dumb quip or criticism of the corporate world then it's some nonsense about consumerism - as if this flaming hypocrite never consumes anything just like the rest of us. He doesn't live modestly, nor does he live in squalor, the sneaky little liar.

This time Professor Bullshit was kind enough to explain his own bullshit:
 
"As you can tell, I have spent many an hour pondering the different ways in which one could restrict, undermine and even eventually destroy a democracy - and almost certainly from within, because China and Russia aren't currently likely to start a war * let alone win it. One way is certainly to bullshit people by making them believe that corporations are the main culprit for all problems in our society - in spite of the fact that capitalism is obviously the last thing skeptical freedom-lovers should be looking at to blame. Capitalism spells freedom, but freedom for the rabble is the last fucking thing I care about.

Notice how I cleverly ended the quote by mentioning corporations? All that hogwash about princes and kings was just a pretext; a sort of bombastic, meaningless list of obvious means of oppression which I simply named so I could punchline my dumb listeners by equating all of them with my favourite pet-peeve - the corporate world, which still refuses to hand over all their assets to me.

And the funny thing is: I don't even have anything against military juntas and party dictatorships! As long as they're left-wing, of course. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Do I not count the likes of Castro and Chavez as my most adoring fans?

Of course corporations aren't unaccountable institutions, that's just a flat-out lie. But hey, that's how I operate! I like to twist facts, make up lies, and just hurl as much bull's shit into the listener's dumb face as I possibly can. I have realized many years ago that the more you bullshit them, the more they respect you - and I am talking about idiots, of course. And idiots have plenty of money with which they can buy books they think they understand - my books - and pay for my hilarious "lectures" which are nothing but soft-spoken hate-speeches aimed squarely against democracy and freedom. I make a huge profit, and keep it aaaaall for myself rather than share them as a good communist. Ha-ha-ha-ha! There's no such thing as a good communist, but those dumb fans of mine wouldn't know that of course.

What really riles me is when either the public arena or the corporate world control the decision-making. You know who truly needs to call all the shots?... ME, of course! And I won't rest until all the institutions in this shitty country belong to me, and me alone! The only way this can happen is through a revolution, a communist one, and that's why this fucking democracy and its fucking successful capitalism are getting in my way! I can't be bothered to participate in the free, democratic political process because there is no guarantee that I'd make it even to a mayoral position, let alone a Senator or President - and even if I did make it to President of this stupid country my powers would be vastly limited by those fucking institutions called the Congress and the damn Senate! How the fuck am I to have absolute power if I have to discuss every damn thing with these assholes?"

Sorry about that. I asked Chumley to explain the reality behind this ridiculous quote, and he just went into a lengthy rant. 

Notice the adjective he uses for the last word: "modern" corporations. Is he actually implying that he never had a problem with older corporations? Is he perhaps suggesting that he never would have criticized the corporations of yesteryear? The corporations of the 1980s? 1950s? The 1920s even?

Chumley is such a bullshitter. Please don't encourage him by caressing and inflating his huge Ego even further. Don't buy his books, and certainly don't go to his lectures - and if you do, try not to applaud for every single lie he says.

* of course, the situation has changed in the meantime; thanks to Obama's self-destructive diplomacy and EU's pussy-footedness, Russia (and perhaps China) has grown brazen in its military ambitions 

http://morepoliticalrants.blogspot.com/2013/08/marxism-basic-guide-for-gullible_24.html

https://vjetropevchecksyourintelligence.blogspot.com/2017/11/imbecile-test-just-how-dumb-are-you.html

The Fools Of Occupy Wall Street

Note: A small part of this text can be found within a more detailed context, in a lengthy rant I wrote, called "Marxism: A Guide For The Gullible Clueless Westerner". This post deals with specific snapshots from the protests, plus delving slightly into the hows and whys of this idiotic communist movement. For a more thorough analysis of Western Marxists and Marxism, visit the above-mentioned text.

Unlike the bloody fools shown in the photos below, I actually have experienced communism first-hand. I was born in former Yugoslavia during Tito's regime, so when I discuss communists and their retarded ideology I don't indulge in guess-work, third-person experience or exaggeration. I actually have a clue what it's really about.

For those of you who actually believe that Occupy Wall Street was a spontaneous, non-partisan, people's "uprising" instead of a well-orchestrated Marxist ploy supported by a tiny minority of misifits: you must be just as dumb as these knuckleheads.  

Clueless western Marxists are in love with the IDEA of the revolution, as the ultimate act of romantic/heroic rebelliousness, rather than being interested in what that idea actually entails. The fact that they stubbornly refuse to read up on the history of communism is one of the many proofs of this. What they excel at, however, is making noise in the streets like the bunch of easily influenced zombies that they are.

The Dumb, The Self-Centered, & The Hateful: 

The Retards Of Occupy Wall Street

Don't fall for this shtick. Evil never sleeps. These hate-filled loonies are constantly working at undermining a democracy from within by spreading flat-out lies. 

Take this banner, for example. These buffoons actually want the rest of us to believe that 99% of Americans are fed up with Wall Street and capitalism - i.e nearly all of 300 million people living in a powerful country of wealth and prosperity. If this were true, then their revolution would have happened decades ago. Certainly, if these clueless nincompoops had that much support in the population, they would have had millions join them in their pathetic street protests - all over the country - as opposed to thousands (of mostly unemployed bums, bored youngsters, easily-lead student sheep, MTV-brainwashed popcorn-munching fad-slaves, extremist vegans, cave-dwelling Greens, and man-hating feminists).

"Jobs, Justice, Education." What the hell does that even mean? Just words lined up in a row. A well-trained parrot can say these three words - and it would make as much sense as when this emotionally-charged sheep does. 

Does this banner's content actually constitute an argument, a proposition, or even a basic statement? Of course not. This is typical meaningless "sloganistic" drivel we have come to accept as normal when these hammer-and-sickle-waving blockheads rush to the streets like a bunch of headless chickens.

Hey, not a bad idea! Sleeping on the sidewalk like a bum is definitely good preparation for this slacker's future life-style - once his parents give up on him and stop sending the monthly checks.

The only thing that's bullet-proof is this gal's empty head. There is nothing inside it that can possibly be damaged in any way, shape or form. I can't think of any military technology that includes bullets that can damage vacuum.

This banner describes the essence of the Western Marxists' unwavering fanaticism and utter unwillingness to question anything they are told by Professor Chomsky, Michael Moore, and other public liars who act as one-man business enterprises, making huge amounts of money from their propaganda films, college appearances, and trashy conspiracy-theory propaganda books. 
If you were to succeed in getting this hysterical Marxist groupie to calm down a bit so that you could ask her what the banner means, she would probably fart out a whole load of confused, quasi-meaningful, pseudo-political gibberish, peppered with words such as stuff, like, and dude. She has no clue what is going on around her - but she does know how to make noise! That's all that counts.

This guy couldn't even figure out how to program a DVD-recorder, let alone solve mankind's most pressing problems (real or imagined).
He looks as if the Taliban itself had sent him to protest against capitalism (i.e. America), but he's got a shirt portraying an Arab and an Israeli embraced in a passionate hug, so chances are he's just a well-meaning chap. 

Movements such as Occupy Wall Street don't just consist of hateful misfits hungry for rich people's blood, and the psychopaths and greedy opportunists who lead them into these needless street "battles". Its ranks also hold gullible innocents, such as this possibly good-natured sheepish follower of fairly low intelligence (which is of course not his fault). Proudly he holds his banner, a statement so stupid I'd be embarrassed to quote it aloud, let alone pose with it in front of the international press.

 

Just look at that dumb face. Bloody hell, she looks as if she thinks she has the weight of the world on her shoulders! Totally clueless that she has the luck of the draw of being born in a free country in which anybody with a smidgeon of intelligence and a work-ethic can make a fairly cozy existence for themselves. Or is this self-centered girlie ignoring the success stories of others just because she cannot get her own act together? Or is she perhaps expecting perfection from society? Is she even thinking? 

And why is there the word "it" missing from her banner? If she is so lazy and stupid that she can't even get ten words written up properly on a banner - which she plans the world to see - then how the hell does she expect to achieve anything in life, with or without a proletariat uprising? She didn't forget to draw a stupid smiley though. That's the extent of her intellect: seeing the world in terms of smileys.

Yet another banner that is just flat-out bullshit. Wall Street isn't in the business of taking away homes. This statement sounds as if she'd found it in a Pyongyang sewer. Capitalism creates wealth, communism destroys it. Capitalism certainly isn't perfect, but the alternative this misinformed putz has in mind is a million times worse. But does this spoiled western egotist know that? I don't think she's read a history book in her life. All her political "education" consists of dumb Hollywood movies, Green Day songs, YouTube clips and CD covers, and the occasional Noam Chomsky quote she accidentally digs up on the internet. Does she look even remotely homeless? She probably still lives with her parents because she refused to accept that job at McDonalds (which is perhaps all she is cut out for.)

The actual meaning of her laughable slogan is:  
"I don't even have my own pad, dude, in which to rock out, hang out, and smoke pot, man, and it must be some rich assholes who are, like, to blame for that and stuff, so coz Noam says that Wall Street is full of evil rich thieves then it must be, like, them and stuff!"

"We The People". Yeah, right. How about "We The 5 People"?

Guess who sent the woman on the left to this march? That was probably the only day in the month she was even allowed to leave the house - and yet, here she is, demonstrating for freedom. She would, wouldn't she? But she is barking up the wrong tree, the deluded cow. Her relatives are probably all dead, wounded, raped, or exiled by ISIS and other lunatics by now - and yet here she is, making animal noises in the country that actually protects her from those hairy-ass-raping lunatics.

Just look at this silly threesome. Where do I even begin?! 

Granny. Evidently, this older lady knows nothing about the corruption in communist and socialist countries, otherwise she'd quietly place the banner on the floor, sneak out of the protest, take the first corporate-made bus home, and lock herself up for months, hoping this picture doesn't appear in newspapers. 
There is corruption everywhere, in every system, so if she wants a perfect system with zero corruption then she should roll up her corporate-made sleeves and devise a theoretical model on her corporate-made laptop that would bring about that kind of amazing change. Until then, shut the fuck up, you corporate-hating but corporate-dependent moron! 

"Get corporate money out of law-making," it says in much smaller letters. Did she realize too late that her first slogan was much too big, leaving too little space for her second one? Or is she a little more ashamed or unsure of the bullshit on the second one? Well, yeah. 
The big slogan, "no more corruption", is something nobody could really disagree with - aside from some corrupt capitalists and the millions upon millions of corrupt communists. The small one, however, stresses on getting CORPORATE money out of law-making - not money per se. Hilarious. "Don't get money out of law-making, just make sure it isn't corporate!" So that means a mobster's money should be allowed.

Middle moron. "I can't afford a lobbyist". But he does seem to be able to afford to dress decently, and his shoes don't seem as if he'd been wearing them for years (a common occurrence in communist countries). Never mind that both main U.S. political parties are involved in the lobbying trade. Or that his beloved American Communist Party would have no need for lobbyists if it ever came to power - as it would control everything, including what kind of shoes he may or may not be able to find in stores, AND his freedom to protest!

IPad-using moron. He has no banner. He is there just to silently support his anti-corporate buddies, while he peruses fanatically and obsessively through his corporate-made toy.

Tom Morello, ladies and gentleman, the very wealthy corporate-sponsored guitarist from the pro-communist anti-corporate corporate-hired band Rage Against the Machine. (The Machine = capitalist oppressors, get it?) 

All-in-all, it was a pretty successful day for him: he played his obligatory little phony-baloney peacenik guitar song, fed his enormous Ego with the aid of his mindless adoring fans, took a few phone numbers from his younger female fans, and then went straight back to his very proletariat-looking stretch-limo which drove him back to his $5,000,000 villa. What a wealth-sharing revolutionary! Hypocrite.

Just by looking at this sexless dweeb, I can tell there is something seriously wrong with him - both genetically and intellectually. 
He is wearing huge ear-piercings - that alone raises red flags. He's got a shitty hair-cut which he is wisely hiding beneath a cap. (Possibly the only wise thing he'd ever done, aside from wiping his ass after taking shits - the same crap that results from eating corporate food.) The cap is bent to the side, as a fashion statement or for whatever other cretinous reason. He's got that hip little, utterly pointless hanky wrapped around his neck, completing the picture of a young pushover totally immersed in his own fad-slavery. Not to mention the dumb face - that's the clincher.

"Don't judge a book by its cover". Sure, but this isn't a book. This is a Marxist moron. They are extremely easy to read i.e. judge.

Talk about left-wingers and their record-setting sweeping statements. "Wall Street is at fault for almost everything!" Wow. Wall Street would have to have the power no less of a god to have that much influence. Where does this delta-male weakling get these "facts" from? Why, straight from his college professors, of course. The sorry misfit is doing a major in African Studies, a topic dear to his self-loathing white-guilt reverse-racist heart. Or he simply googled Noam Chomsky and read that "capitalism is at the root of all evil" - phrased differently, of course.

Hey, nerd, how about working for a change? Any asshole can stand around holding a banner, bitching about rich people being far more well-off and successful than they are. Don't envy the rich, putz - get rich yourself.

So theatrical, these Marxist clowns, aren't they? Drama, drama, drama. I'd like to see him pull this stunt in North Korea, against that regime. How he would beg for mercy afterward, in some dingy dungeon, with his balls tied to a chair... Oh, I'd love to see that scene.

Oh, the symbolism. A dollar-bill plastered over his mouth, signifying a lack of freedom due to "big business"? I would like to know how exactly large corporations are standing between this cretinous layabout and his goals. He certainly had enough freedom to march all week against a system that provided him with such a nice suit-and-tie!

The hair looks nice too. Paid much for it, have we? Perhaps financed by his hard-working Dad, who doesn't have the time to muck around in the streets of New York, playing the role of the rebel-without-a-clue. Sorry, I meant rebel-without-a-fucking-clue.

He can't even bother to fix his tie properly. Probably yet another preppie slacker, dissatisfied with his sex-life and friends, hence rushing off to the streets to support all the other misfits, losers, and liars.

And I am glad he can afford to play around with money like that. You know, scribble things on it, plaster it on his mouth, and then possibly lose it somewhere along the way during the march. No problem; there's plenty more where that came from. Daddy's number is in the phone.

Ahhh, so that's what this is about... 
Well, Irregular Joe, America is one of the most free countries in the world - but that does NOT include the freedom to SKIP WORK in order to have some fun in the park, meet chicks, and impersonate a rebel-without-a-fucking-clue for an entire week. I'd fire you instantly, if you were my employee. In fact, I'd never have hired this kind of loser in the first place.

Or is he employed at all? Marxists are notorious propagandists i.e. liars. They will over-dramatize, exaggerate, invent, bullshit, manipulate, impersonate, and do just about anything else in order to get their stupid point across. Any ass can get dressed like this and claim his job is in danger because of the use of his "voice". The "People's Voice". 1.4% of the people, to be exact. That's a lot of voices - 99%, to be "exact".

Marxist Maths:

1.4 = 99

No, I don't get it either.

Even if he does have a job, he really has nothing to fear, because, as he clearly points out, he might lose his job "for having a voice", but since he's muzzled himself he's got no voice, so he's got nothing to fear. (Logic 101: too difficult for the average Marxist ass.) Besides, as if his boss gave a shit what this dummy does during his free time - if this is his lunch break. What phony-baloney paranoia. These idiots will make a "spectacle" out of anything.

Not to mention that people in America are losing jobs for being politically INcorrect, not for being politically correct. Who's the real bully?

Oh, right... I should have known. The cheesy dollar-bill shtick was "masterminded" by their college professors in advance.

Some of these college students are such obedient little zombies. 

Where do I sign up to get my own personal slave who will do anything I tell him to?

"Mom, phone Dad to call his lawyer to bail me out! These Fascist pigs arrested me again for no reason!"

No reason - aside from public disturbance, rudeness toward a cop, screaming at the top of her lungs for an hour like a mad bitch, and throwing things at passers-by. If she dared do any of this in a communist country she'd get raped by the cops, imprisoned, raped again, then placed into a gulag where rape would be as normal as taking a piss at a rotting corpse lying nearby. Fucking moron.


Oh, these preppie kids and their wealthy parents... What a rebel she is.

"Who cares that capitalism benefits most people? It hasn't brought me any riches! Kill! Kill! Kill! Eat the Rich!"

Two words: CLASS ENVY. Just like the boy in kindergarten who is jealous of his friend's shiny Transformers collection. I guess some of us never grow up and learn to accept responsibility for our own actions and failures. Ironically, the rich are this idiot's only chance of getting a job, if only he had enough economic savvy to even begin to understand what I mean.

Or did he imply we should literally eat the rich? Nothing would surprise me with these left-wing extremists anymore, not even hobby-cannibalism. 

Did her boyfriend's left-wing college professor write that down for her? I doubt this airhead can read, let alone follow the thoughts of Goethe, then pick out quotes that apply (?) to the moronic Great Big Commie March For Freedom.

Btw, this is what Noam Chomsky, the Jesus of the modern American Marxist movement once said:  

"The general population doesn't know what's happening, and it doesn't even know that it doesn't know." 

Sound familiar?

And anyway, I have a bone to pick with this quote, even if it is from the Great Goethe. (Unlike these clueless, young, brainwashed Marxist American sheep, I do actually question everything rather than blindly listen to all those whose names are written in large neon letters, i.e. unlike these cretinous sheep I don't accept at face value every thought - from anybody, including "legendary thinkers".) 
If a man believes he is free, then for all practical purposes he is free. That sort of connects directly to the old adage, "what you don't know can't hurt you". In other words, if a man feels free hence is content with his life, who the hell are you to tell him that he needs to change things around for your benefit?

This much-abused and flawed quote is just a great way to use self-serving argumentation, hoping the blatant hypocrisy of it being used by communist freedom-haters isn't noticed, and hoping that it gets accepted without scrutiny just because the Great Wise Goethe wrote it.

Besides, who knows what context Goethe wrote this in. Chomsky doesn't care, and certainly the dumb girlie in the red shirt doesn't either. Whatever the case, it's safe to assume that Goethe would be gravely upset by seeing these misfits misuse his texts to advance their stupid cause.

Is this a recently unemployed fashion model, recovering from depression after not being able to finance her cocaine habit anymore, spontaneously joining a street-protest she understands nothing about? Is she pissed off because her wealthy boyfriend dumped her for another drug-snorting anorexic floozie? Or is she simply depressed that she has no chest? Looks as if she is staring at the sky, praying to God for help, to free her from the fat female cop who must be getting a kick out of arresting a dumb skinny blonde...
But doesn't the cocaine-sniffing tart know that communism doesn't allow for coveting of any gods aside from Marx, Lenin, and Noam? Or that under a communist regime her cocaine pocket-money would be reduced to buying her only a few grains per year?

I could bet my left nostril that this girlie doesn't even know that Europe is a continent. I doubt she can locate the U.S. on a map of North America, let alone a world map. I don't even think she has an inkling what the difference between communism and capitalism might be. But she's here, "protesting", being a "rebel".

She doesn't seem to mind the cop exposing much of her upper-torso body. Perhaps she joined the demonstrations just to be seen and filmed. Exhibitionist? Why not. It's as moronic a reason as any to be there.

Trust these devious, lying Marxists to quote and abuse a text written by freedom-loving men. The authors of the Declaration of Independence had never intended it to be used for anti-freedom movements, nor would any of them even remotely condone this kind of political opportunism. The balls these hypocritical idiots have. 

A typical example of how the Left use the terminology, words, and literary works that represent the ideals of the other side - in order to fight that same side on the basis that they - commies - allegedly hold these anti-communist ideals close to their hearts. Whoever falls for this crap, or at least fails to realize the fat irony, is an utter imbecile.

"Economic Injustice is NOT Beautiful". No, but your pecks certainly are! What's more miraculous, that Noam Chomsky has a world-wide reputation as a serious thinker - or that this Chomsky fan spelled this slogan correctly?

This one has got to be my favourite. 

Something tells me this poseur had joined the march just to "find chicks". Why else go shirtless? Penis over ideology, that's the impression I get. Apparently, his torso is not feeling the effects of the cold, but his empty head needs plenty of woolen warming. Ditto his black buddy. "Hey, we gonna be in the papers coz we dressed like that!"

"You can chaw me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind!" - Gandhi


Where - do - I - even - start?! If his white buddy makes a total ass of himself, then the black guy really one-ups him with ease.

First of all, Gandhi is the last person I'd ever want to quote if I wanted to have the least bit of self-respect. A hypocritical, devious little runt if I ever read one. I had written a lengthy deconstruction of this fake guru's bullshit thoughts (you will find the link at the bottom). 
This kind of idealistic/romantic "I-cannot-be-subdued-mind-body-or-soul" drivel comes first-and-foremost from charlatans, populists and other bullshit-artists. If this black guy were to be just strapped to a chair, he'd be sobbing his guts out, calling for Mommy. And if he actually saw instruments of torture laying around on a nearby table, he'd pass out and fall into a coma. So much for muscular gym-membership beta-males and their pathetic posturing.

But the part that really had me in hysterics was the notion of this well-built jock mentioning the destruction of his body - when one considers what Gandhi's skinny little vegan body looked like. Fucking hell, these Marxists will be the death of me - either by shooting me with a Kalashnikov or by making me laugh my ass off! 

She does seem to be spewing plenty of hate for somebody who is so pro-love.

 Now, this banner really doesn't mean shit - certainly not in the sense its blond author intended it to mean. Surely, even this hormonally-challenged PMSer knows that...? 

Nope. She fucking wrote it.

She might as well keep that banner, and bring it along for the next Bon Jovi concert. Or an anti-abortion rally. Or her dance class. It's a meaningless all-purpose slogan.

Btw, how does one "occupy" something for love? The word "occupy" implies violence, force i.e. an involuntary participation by the party that is supposed to be "loved", so this notion of getting or creating love through the use of physical force is quite cretinous. Reminds me a bit of the old hippie slogan "fight against violence", but even dumber.

Only circus clowns, little children, masked ball participants, masonic-orgy gang-bangers, and guys playing serial-killers in dumb slasher films wear masks. But he's not that far-removed from any of those five groups: his behaviour is clownish, his I.Q. is child-like, he thinks he's at a party, he thinks with his cock more than his tiny brain, and his morals are that of a serial-killer.

He wears the by-now iconic mask worn by a murderous character played in a left-wing Hollywood propaganda film that supports terrorism. Sorry... "freedom-fighting". He's even got that cute little pro-Palestinian hanky wrapped around his empty head, signifying that, yes, he does support the massacres and bombings of innocent civilians - just as long as they're Jews, capitalists, and westerners. "Selective pro-terrorism", that is what this deluded misfit is all about. (And he might not even know it!)

Now, let's see... that dumb banner he's holding so shyly. Let me translate that for you, because Marxists either lie or they make vague, meaningless statements. We've got both this time around:

"The corrupt fear us" = "Anybody who's richer than me - aside from Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Susan Sarandon, Oprah, and about 50,000 other wealthy Marxists living in a capitalist society - fear us"

"The honest support us" = "Al-Qaeda, Putin, Castro, Hamas, the Hezbollah, the I.R.A. and 5,000 wealthy Hollywood Marxist morons support us"

"The heroic join us" = "The unemployed, the malcontents, the misfits, the hateful, the spoiled, the rebel wannabes, bored kids, bored housewives, sexually-frustrated bored housewives, the envious, the lazy, the lazy that collect welfare checks, the morons, the cretins, the retards, the extremely gullible, the highly confused, the misinformed, the brainwashed, the brain-dead, and the utterly lost support us."

This is Occupy Wall Street in a nutshell. 

No violent "pro-peace" commie rally would be complete without the obligatory dreadlocked environmentalist retard mooing on his badly tuned guitar with the scary tone-deaf voice. Just look at the passion on this Green's face. Pity he can't muster that kind of passion for reading history books or looking for a job.

The auditions for America's Got Talent didn't go down too well, so now he's pissed off at the whole world. Such a Marxist way to react to personal failure, isn't it.

Hang on... Why is this hysterically screaming religion-hating Marxist atheist (on the left, where else) quoting a theologian such as Saint Augustine? He was a devout Christian influential in the way Western Christianity developed - something Karl Marx sought to usurp.

They are just so confused, these left-wing ninnies.

Whom will she quote next... Hitler? (Well, why not... He was a socialist, after all. A National-Socialist.)

"Good Job $$$ NOW!!!"  
Now what the hell is that supposed to mean? I will assume this layabout is unemployed and is waiting like a spoiled princess for somebody to hand her a well-paying job on a plate, just like that. Most likely she is sitting at home all day long, watching Oprah, waiting for job offers to pour in through the mail-opening in the door. But who'd want to hire this slouch? She isn't even literate enough to come up with a banner that doesn't elicit laughs and smirks.

Banner 1. You're not a human being, you're a retarded human being. Big difference. You only wish you were good enough to be somebody's commodity. 

The most use I could think for non-commodities such as this non-starving, well-dressed little whiner is to be my chair. Or my desk. But I suspect even that would be intellectually too trying for him.

Banner 2. "The government did this". 
Yeah, but then why ask for MORE government? These idiots constantly bitch about the government being at fault for everything, but then wait for Noam Chomsky to give them a revolution that would result in the biggest government America would ever see. A big fat chunky round DUH.

This self-righteous, clueless dummie should feel honoured that he gets to be carried across New York - for free - by a bunch of guys who actually work for a living. 

Personally, I'd drop him on the pavement, if I were them. But first I'd make sure he was a few meters higher up. No need to make the state pay for his lobotomy. A free one would save some of the tax-payers' hard-earned money.

Before I get to the various banners, just take a look at the young airhead wearing a V For Vendetta mask. Does he not realize how silly he looks? Is he embarrassed about being seen together with all these other losers? Doesn't he know that movie is pro-terrorist? So much for this "pro-peace march".

Banner 1: "I am too big too fail". 
Nobody is too big to fail, especially big morons. Here we have exactly what I am talking about: a movement largely dependent on losers and failures who are unable to compete in a free capitalist democracy - resulting in envy of the upper-class, the middle-class, and of anybody who has made it or has more than they do. And just because they couldn't cut it, they join a movement that proclaims the entire system as flawed and unfair. Well, guess what? Life is unfair, so suck it up and get on with it, putz. 

It isn't easy being a failure, and I don't fault him for being born a loser, but is that really society's fault? No. And should society pamper you like a baby, take care of all your wants and needs, just because you're an incompetent fool? No.

Of course, this goofball was just badly paraphrasing the movement's "99% We Are Too Big To Fail" slogan. He was merely too stupid to play around with it properly.

Banner 2: "Remember the little people". 
Apparently, little people write in little letters. You have to get a telescope to read it. (Not that you're missing much.)

Banner 3: "This is not a protest, (this is a conversation)". 
(Part of the slogan is obscured by banner 1, the one carried by that big failure who refuses to fail, but I will assume this is what the entire slogan reads.) Two blatant fallacies right there: 
a) that is a protest (what the fuck else would you call it?), 
and b) it's a monologue, not a conversation. Left-wing extremists don't engage in dialogue; they merely scream and shout like demented banshees, and when they receive weaponry they shoot to kill - no questions asked (and certainly no conversations initiated).

Banner 4: "I am on no one's side". 
He isn't saying he is non-partisan or bipartisan, i.e. that he isn't a slave to either party's ideology (as many are), but that he is against both. After all, even the very left-leaning Democrats are still a huge disappointment to most American Marxists.

Well, duuuuh, of course you want to occupy everything. You're greedy Marxist revolutionaries, aren't you? 

"What's yours is mine. Everything." 

If only these uneducated, Grand-Theft-playing, unemployed, badly employed, hamburger-flipping cretins knew what horrors would await them in a state-run economy. They'd embrace their "low" salaries, their "inadequate" benefit checks, sit in front of their Oprahs and baseball games and be very quiet and humble, instead of causing traffic jams and being a nuisance to the rest of society who are trying to make a living.

In a sense I fully agree. 99% really would be too big of a percentage of the population to fail. Trouble is, the 99% is more like 3%, if that.

But for the sake of argument, let's just say they are correct, that indeed 99% of the U.S. voters support these infantile screamers. What would it say about the 99% that they cannot overthrow the 1%?

It would mean they are dumb-as-dirt. And in fact they are dumb-as-dirt. Or dumb-as-3%-dirt.

"Mundo sin fronteras" says another banner here. "A world without borders". Doesn't this gullible shithead know that in most communist countries it is extremely difficult to cross fronteras to leave? The options are either crossing the fronteras illegally and risking being shot or arrested, or bribing a Party member with a vast amount of money to slip you a visa into your passport illegally. The key word here is "illegally". But what does the average Western Marxist know... 

... can be used to fill up 3 million football stadiums.

Slacker: "Fascist piiiiiiiiiigs!!!!" 

Cop: "Calm down, man. We're just holding your arms."

Slacker: "Injustice! Death! Murder! Destruction! Political Torture!"

Cop: "Hold your horses... Your rich Daddy and his lawyer will be at the precinct in a few minutes."

Is this a scene from Occupy Wall Street, or just a day in the life of security male nurses in a nearby lunatic asylum? It's hard to tell.

"I love New York - aside from all the damn fucking rich people in it who have much more money than me, i.e. I hate 90% of all New Yorkers." The bit about "love" is probably reserved for his only truly beloved part of New York - namely for himself.

Noise, noise, and more noise. That's all they can do, these egotistical failures. That, and shitty, dumb slogans. Western Marxists and Greens truly are the desperates, the misfits, and the losers of our time.

If you are still confused and don't quite understand yet what I am talking about, go to this link: 
http://morepoliticalrants.blogspot.com/2013/08/marxism-basic-guide-for-gullible_24.html

Hitler becomes a cannibal: 
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=darmMmCTdWI

For a nice little analysis of Gandhi's wise quotes: 
http://vjetropev.blogspot.com/2013/05/gandhi-re-quoted.html

For an additional analysis of hippies: 
http://vjetropev.blogspot.com/2013/06/fitting-in.html

Or let's just get to the crux, huh? Do my "Imbecile Test". Find out how evolved you are, i.e. whether you're closer to a chimp or an amoeba: 
http://vjetropev.blogspot.com/2014/03/are-you-imbecile.html